<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Same &#8216;ol Same &#8216;ol.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scratchley.org/2008/10/21/same-ol-same-ol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scratchley.org/2008/10/21/same-ol-same-ol/</link>
	<description>Vistas from a digital gadabout...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Snider</title>
		<link>http://www.scratchley.org/2008/10/21/same-ol-same-ol/comment-page-1/#comment-21559</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratchley.org/2008/10/21/same-ol-same-ol/#comment-21559</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just like to point out that the Green Party is NOT a party of the political left (as you seem to imply near the end of this post). While they can be seen as &quot;left-leaning&quot; with regard to social and environmental issues, they&#039;re actually pretty far to the right when you look at their financial policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to point out that the Green Party is NOT a party of the political left (as you seem to imply near the end of this post). While they can be seen as &#8220;left-leaning&#8221; with regard to social and environmental issues, they&#8217;re actually pretty far to the right when you look at their financial policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.scratchley.org/2008/10/21/same-ol-same-ol/comment-page-1/#comment-20999</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranger Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratchley.org/2008/10/21/same-ol-same-ol/#comment-20999</guid>
		<description>No, seriously.. run for the Green Party.. I will help fund it with a Bottle Drive for you. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, seriously.. run for the Green Party.. I will help fund it with a Bottle Drive for you. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Grier</title>
		<link>http://www.scratchley.org/2008/10/21/same-ol-same-ol/comment-page-1/#comment-20998</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Grier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratchley.org/2008/10/21/same-ol-same-ol/#comment-20998</guid>
		<description>Greg and I had a brief interchange on Twitter re: this post. At his behest, I&#039;m reposting the exchange here.

@gscratch Heh. Item 1) Cultural Mozaic, not melting pot -- that&#039;s USA. Also, were you channeling Heinlein? Compliment not a dig.....

@gscratch 2) yep, but consider the representation by population. Unfair Geographically. Reform needs to happen at other levels.

@gscratch 3) Good. May would have done well as a mainstream. Politics needs less politics to attract good candidates. Business is easier...

@gscratch 4) Heh. Funny. Can&#039;t happen in current system. It&#039;s adversarial. Government VS Off. Opposition. Not doing your job if you agree w/ opponent

Greg replied:
@bgrier Re (2) A regional party focus can drown out a national party with national focus. Bloq can stymie ndp with QC issues. knowhutimean?

My my brilliant reply:
@gscratch Ah, but isn&#039;t that incentive for ND to address QC issues locally, effectively within the national structure?

All that considered...awesome post Greg. You voiced your thoughts well.

-- Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg and I had a brief interchange on Twitter re: this post. At his behest, I&#8217;m reposting the exchange here.</p>
<p>@gscratch Heh. Item 1) Cultural Mozaic, not melting pot &#8212; that&#8217;s USA. Also, were you channeling Heinlein? Compliment not a dig&#8230;..</p>
<p>@gscratch 2) yep, but consider the representation by population. Unfair Geographically. Reform needs to happen at other levels.</p>
<p>@gscratch 3) Good. May would have done well as a mainstream. Politics needs less politics to attract good candidates. Business is easier&#8230;</p>
<p>@gscratch 4) Heh. Funny. Can&#8217;t happen in current system. It&#8217;s adversarial. Government VS Off. Opposition. Not doing your job if you agree w/ opponent</p>
<p>Greg replied:<br />
@bgrier Re (2) A regional party focus can drown out a national party with national focus. Bloq can stymie ndp with QC issues. knowhutimean?</p>
<p>My my brilliant reply:<br />
@gscratch Ah, but isn&#8217;t that incentive for ND to address QC issues locally, effectively within the national structure?</p>
<p>All that considered&#8230;awesome post Greg. You voiced your thoughts well.</p>
<p>&#8211; Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

